CHARLES H. KLEIN URBAN ANTHROPOLOGY
  • Home
  • Projects
  • Teaching
  • Blog

Time for Anthropology 101 at SCOTUS?

8/1/2015

7 Comments

 
It’s kinship week in my Social Theory class, so I thought I'd start my blogging in earnest by taking a quick look at Justice Robert’s dissent in the recent same-sex marriage case.

Justice Robert’s writes in his first paragraph:


The Court invalidates the marriage laws of more than half the States and orders the transformation of a social  institution that has formed the  basis of human society for millennia, for the Kalahari Bushmen and the Han   Chinese, the Carthaginians and the Aztecs. Just who do we think we are?

I won’t go into the details of marriage practices in these societies –for more info here, take a look at Ishaan Tharoor’s blog in the Washington Post .
Justice Robert’s statement makes me wonder if he ever took an anthropology course in his long academic career. I’m thinking not.

(1) For starters,  “laws” might not be the best term to describe the rules around human marriage practices, as this term implies a level of legal institutionalization not present in all human societies over time.

(2) Anthropologists situate marriage within the concept of “kinship,” which extends beyond marriage to include the family, gender relations, household economics, descent (who's related to whom), and many other social relationships. Kinship systems vary considerably cross-culturally. For a good overview of anthropological kinship theory, see Linda Stone’s Kinship and Gender: An Introduction.

(3) Take a look at the Human Resource Area Files World Cultures database and George Murdock’s Ethnographic Atlas. They show that prior to recent times, various forms polygamy were in fact much more common than monogamy.  So much for marriage always being one man  + one woman!

Certainly colonialism and the spread of Christianity have increased the prevalence of monogamy throughout the world. And as Justice Roberts almost got right, kinship is a central social institution throughout all human societies. But Justice Robert’s conclusions are a stretch, and I’m left wanting a tighter analysis from the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court!
7 Comments
http://commentpirateruncomptefacebook.xyz link
1/19/2016 12:27:02 am

I was pretty pleased to discover this page. I need to to thank you for your time for this particularly fantastic read!! I definitely loved every bit of it and I have you saved to fav to see new things in your site.

Reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=194ZAzaSTMo link
2/6/2016 07:23:01 am

great site

Reply
http://www.trucchigta5.xyz link
2/12/2016 12:34:58 pm

I'm very pleased to uncover this page. I wanted to thank you for your time just for this fantastic read!! I definitely liked every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff on your site.

Reply
http://www.researchpapermama.com/ link
7/18/2016 10:14:39 pm

I am in fact thankful to the owner of this web page who has shared this fantastic post at at this time.

Reply
essay writer link
7/19/2016 02:00:42 am

After looking at a handful of the blog articles on your web site, I truly like your technique of blogging. I saved as a favorite it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back in the near future. Please check out my web site as well and let me know what you think.

Reply
ap intermediate time table 2017 link
1/9/2017 06:21:22 pm

ap intermediate time table 2017

Reply
http://www.bestdissertationsite.com/ link
3/10/2017 08:47:39 pm

It was nice to read this paragraph. Hope to see more interesting posts from you here.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Charles H. Klein

    Archives

    April 2016
    August 2015

    Categories

    All
    Observations

    RSS Feed

    Private Access
Department of Anthropology
Portland State University

biography 
contact me 
  • Home
  • Projects
  • Teaching
  • Blog